Posted 10/15/2016 1:51 PM (GMT -5)
A very relevant discussion ---
From "Cure Unknown"
Burgdorfer was dissecting an infected rabbit and accidentally punctured its bladder, which splashed urine in his eye(s), which is how he was infected w/ lyme. Soon he developed an EM rash under his arm and took penicillin, the rash returned so he was placed on tetracycline and the rash didn't return. But then academicians, due to the lyme politics at the time (80s - 90s) who were paranoid about what they saw as paranoia about the lyme epidemic (in New England) decided to revoke his dx. Doctors got involved and dug up his old files and claimed that his "antibodies were too low" for him to have lyme.
IDIOTS.
A few years back word got out that the blood supply isn't being tested for most of these TBD. Not a surprise - it would bankrupt it. At the beginning of the HIV crisis when it was finally understood what it was and several people had been infected through the blood supply, testing was investigated but deemed so expensive it would also bankrupt hospitals who offered to pay for it. I think a little progress has been made on that front but not good enough.
It's now well-known that babesia is prevalent through the blood supply. There is no reason to assume babesia is in the supply, but lyme, rickettsia, bartonella, etc. isn't. The blood supply is already so precarious that the last thing .gov wants to do is start admitting all of the things they're not testing for.
I totally agree with others who have urged TBD patients to NOT donate blood or organs. This is pretty important. MacDonald is a pathologist but like Traveler said - it is almost impossible to have a thorough enough autopsy done to investigate lyme but I think there are some organ repositories out there - but you not only donate your organ, you have to pay them to receive and study your organs. And the likelihood of the pathologist at your County morgue accepting another pathologist's findings is probably remote.
I also personally agree that half of the Parkinson's, Alz, MS dx we see are based on an uncontrolled microbial infection. These are not diseases where cancer cells are easily identified - these diagnoses, just like lyme & co, are based on a group of symptoms and that is how they are dx. It's very much like a clinical dx of lyme & co.
Originally, MS also was stigmatized as psychosomatic in nature until the MRI was developed and white matter on the brain could be seen. Then, all of a sudden, these patients were believed. MS was also originally considered a bacterial infection... but when the autoimmune issues because "popular" and Big Pharma started developing very expensive drugs that suppressed immune function that reduced symptoms... then MS became an autoimmune condition.
No, I don't think any of these associations is a coincidence.
-p