TheJay -
Good responses already. I also had negative IgG, but was CDC-positive for IgM--yet I had contracted Lyme 16+ years before I finally got tested. Luckily, my LLMD knew to ignore the ridiculous CDC/IDSA "rules" for testing and diagnoses, which mean nothing, and we started treating.
The lie that a IgM means anything specific, particularly with a stealthy pathogen that disrupts all normal immune function (which is what these serology tests measure), is yet another ploy by The Powers That Be to produce as few positive Lyme diagnoses as possible.
The CDC's Lyme testing protocol is designed as part of their surveillance data criteria, which tracks disease trends--the surveillance data criteria was not designed for diagnosis. Why does the CDC still promote it as the ONLY "approved" methodology for Lyme testing? You may not want to know the answer.
The CDC does tell MDs not to use the test results solely for diagnosis and to clinically diagnose Lyme, but that directive is buried on the website and most MDs have no clue it's there, or choose to ignore it and follow the limited test results and sometimes they intentionally do this so that they don't have to "get involved" in a controversial Lyme case. This is 100% against their hippocratic oath. They can likely be sued for this but I haven't looked into that, specifically...
Some MDs honestly have no idea how to clinically diagnose Lyme. Some are too lazy to learn. For whatever reason, it's best to stay clear of these 3 types of MDs.
And, since your MD is giving you bad info, he/she is not qualified to effectively diagnose you and is certainly unqualified to treat you effectively.
You should probably try to set up an appt with a different LLMD ASAP - they are often hard to get into. Or maybe two - in case the first one isn't a good "fit".
-p
Post Edited (Pirouette) : 9/8/2017 12:11:04 PM (GMT-6)