jb1994 said...
I do believe some people feel "fried" from all the radio waves going around. But I watched an episode of a TV show that covered this and they said, basically, 5G is almost exactly like 4G, just with a fancy new name. We have a tower about a mile from our house and I haven't noticed its effects that I can recognize but I don't know how I'd be able to tell. My symptoms have all been about the same for a while now with some minor improvements.
Wrong... 5G is not like 4G at all (4G is still crap for you too) The G stands for a generation of cell technology. 5G = ultra-high frequency waves. between 10Ghz up to 90Ghz. 4G is well under 10Ghz. Law Enforcement even purchased telephone poles where small cells will be located because they know the upper limit of these ultra high frequency waves can be used as crowd control, if the beam is directed. Yup. I have one outside town and every time I go to the store I get a massive headache. It started right after they put the 5G small cell up and it took me a good month to figure it out.
There are NO legal limits on exposure to EMR. Conveniently for the telecommunications industry, there are only non-legally enforceable guidelines such as those produced by the grandly named International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, which turns out to be like the Wizard of Oz, just a tiny NGO in Germany that appoints its own members, none of whom is a medical doctor or environmental expert.
Some might say that 5G is safer than 4G and that just isn't true, as beams need to be concentrated and have a far greater output to account for the lose or permeability through walls and objects. We need to stop parroting the FCC propaganda that only ionizing radiation is dangerous. Long term exposure of even low grade non-ionizing radiation has been proven by peer reviewed double blind placebo studies to have various negative biological effects.
Here are thousands of independent studies illustrating biological effects of non-ionizing EMF's, including 5th generation wireless technology with and without heating, under the recommended guidelines by the FCC. Keep in mind these guidelines or cutoff for maximum levels of EMF exposure are astronomically higher than most other countries.
http://www.bioinitiative.info/bioInitiativeReport2012.pdf
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zeM5L7-x4Xnu9B6SxpHPQ0J_dHIHMQCy/view
https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Presentation-on-Small-Cell-5-G-to-North-Carolina-Governor-PDF-of-Slides.pdf
https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/5g-emf-hazards-dr-martin-l.-pall-eu-emf2018-6-11us3-1.pdf
https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Scientist-5G-appeal-2017.pdf
https://ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view
Endocrine System Damage
______________________________________
Peer reviewed research illustrates impacts to the pineal gland, adrenal gland, and thyroid gland. These glands balance hormones that involve sleep. Research has shown that low levels of microwave exposure can reduce melatonin. Melatonin is not just critical to maintaining our sleep rhythm but it is also an extremely important antioxidant that helps to repair damaged DNA and reduces the growth of cancer cells. Additionally, research shows thyroid hormone levels can be impacted by wireless radiation. It has been established that even a small change in thyroid hormones can alter the brain.
Genotoxic Effects
______________________________________
Radiation at extremely low levels (0.0001 the level emitted by the average digital cellular telephone) caused heart attacks and the deaths of some chicken embryos…independent, third-party peer-reviewed studies need to be conducted in the U.S. to begin examining the effects from radiation on migratory birds and other trust species. —Willie Taylor, US Department of the Interior in his February 2014 letter to Mr. Eli Veenendaal of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Dept. of Commerce.
Studies at non-thermal (no measurable temperature change) levels of microwave exposures show chromosomal instability, altered gene expression, gene mutations, DNA fragmentation, and DNA structural breaks. Genetic mutations and cellular damage can potentially contribute to cancer growth. Strong effects from microwaves have been found in stem cells. Since stem cells are more active in children, researchers are concerned that children are at increased risk.
While electromagnetic fields may not directly damage DNA, research indicates they could set into motion a series of biological impacts that result in genetic damage.
A 2015 experimental study found that 2.4 GHz (Wi-Fi radiation) can alter expression of some of the miRNAs, and the studies authors concluded that “long-term exposure of 2.4 GHz RF may lead to adverse effects such as neurodegenerative diseases originated from the alteration of some miRNA expression and more studies should be devoted to the effects of RF radiation on miRNA expression levels.”
Dr. Lai analyzed research since 2006 and found there are more papers reporting effects from exposure than no effect: New radiofrequency studies report that 65% of genetic studies show effects and 35% do not show effects.
Oxidative Stress
_______________________________________
Oxidative stress is the formation of tissue-damaging free radicals. A recent research review shows 93 out of 100 currently available peer-reviewed studies indicate that radio-frequency radiation increases oxidative stress. This stress response damages cells and DNA through the production of peroxides and free radicals. Oxidative stress is implicated in the cause of many diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer’s disease.
Fertility and Reproduction
_______________________________________
Consistent evidence from experimental research, epidemiological studies, in vitro (cells) laboratory studies, and in vivo (animal) studies shows that RF exposure is associated with reduced sperm count, motility and concentration, as well as DNA damage and altered cell structure. Research also shows damage after wireless exposure to the ovaries of rats and mice, as well as changes in the eggs of flies and birds. This is possibly, although no causative evidence of the 60% drop in male fertility rates. It could however, be a contributing factor.
Scientific Evidence Documenting Increased Cancer From Exposure
_______________________________________
The research evidence indicates that long term use of cell phones and wireless increase the risk of cancer risk. Independent longitudinal research has consistently shown that “heavy” (30 min/day) cellphone users have an increased risk of brain cancer. Such research lead to the World Health Organization’s International Agency for the Research on Cancer to classify this radiation as a Class 2 B Possible Human Carcinogen in 2011. Since 2011, the evidence has increased.
Somebody said...
“A disservice has been done in inaccurately depicting the body of science, which actually indicates that there are biological effects from the radiation emitted by wireless devices, including damage to DNA, and evidence for increased risk of cancer, without heating and other substantial health consequences…The public the world over has been misled by this reporting.” — Dr. Ronald B. Herberman
Dr. Hardell’s research showed that adults who started using cell or cordless phones as teenagers had an 8-fold higher risk of brain cancer on the side of their head where they held the phone. A French study also found increased brain cancer in long term cell phone users. To date, the only published study of children’s risk of brain cancer from cell phone use found more than a 2-fold risk after >2.8 years of use (from billing records), combined with a statistically significant trend of increasing risk with increasing years of use.
In 2015 Lerchl et al published an important replication study which confirms that wireless acts as a tumor promoter. In this important study, lymphomas and tumors of the lungs and livers in exposed animals were significantly higher. The wireless exposure was at low to moderate exposure levels well below exposure limits for the users of mobile phones. This research is significant in that it used a larger group of mice and replicated tumor-promoting effects shown in a 2010 study.
P.S - One of the very worst aspects of 5G technology is the surviellance and privacy infringement issues. Seriously, these waves will be going through your home and can pick up anything you might have on if it is SMART based. That being said, if you already have a new smart meter, then you already have a two way wireless tranciever in your home spying on you. Your utility takes that data and sells in to third parties and is legally allowed to do it with your tacit consent.
That means if you do not say no, or don't know about
it, then that means yes. That's crony America for you.
Post Edited (birthdaysuit) : 7/22/2019 1:28:26 AM (GMT-6)