TruDOSE IV Platelet Therapy- Experiences? Is it legit? Safe?

in general, i think anything that claims to "cure" such a broad range of difficult to treat illnesses does indeed raise red flags

if these things also tend to
-have large price tags
-are sold by practitioners who get financial gain from doing so
-tend to be promoted on youtube or social media - by "experts" or health gurus, influencers etc

then you can see there are incentives at work that encourage their sale/use - but do not necessarily align with what is best for patients

it sounds like this particular treatment just a branded version of platelet rich plasma

i think there is research supporting some quantifiable benefits from platelet rich plasma treatments for certain conditions - but whether these are enough to turn around such a difficult chronic infectious disease like chronic lyme, is highly debatable in my view. i have never seen any useful data on that.

it may have some utility as a supportive therapy for chronic lyme - i don't think we have enough research to know for sure - but if so it could result in a perceived short term benefit -

this would be another concern for me - as anything that seems to help in the short term could be marketed as a "cure" - as a deliberate business strategy - eg using testimonials as these expensive alternative therapies tend to do.
this would produce diverging incentives for the practitioner / brand owner vs the patient - such that it would be in the companies interest for the patient to keep having successive treatments - even though they may not be getting any lasting benefit - adding to the list of potential bad incentives.

in terms of mode of operation - the general mechanism by which PRP is supposed to work is by lowering inflammation - and there is typically excessive inflammation in chronic infections, so in so far as that goes this is good.
BUT, lowering inflammation alone is not usually sufficient to cure a chronic infection - as the infectious organism is free to multiply again and cause more inflammation after treatment is removed.

so on the face of it such a therapy does not seem to fit well with a curative approach to infection. And there is the added risk that - if they did experience some symptom relief, a patient could be lured into repeated treatments over the long term to try to get continued symptom relief - but without addressing the underlying infection, and at great financial cost, as well as time lost where they could otherwise have been actively treating the infection more effectively.

so my personal view - would be to possibly explore it as a supportive therapy to some other better evidence supported anti-infection treatments - but not as a stand-alone treatment - and being aware of the above concerns - and only if the price is not a concern.

good luck

one of our other members has a rheumatic fever diagnosis - as well as lyme, bart etc in the mix