Tudpock18 said...
I think this is a first...well, maybe for a prostate cancer forum and not a split personality forum! Can someone please send me a scorecard on the duel between the multiple bubbas and notbubbas vs. the many Jacks?
Jim
You know, I am obviously missing some posts, due to finally using the blocking feature for at least one poster. I should have done that years ago, rather than trying to respond and defend myself against endlessly negative posts. I thought that I could NOT do that, because then I wouldn't know what kind of trouble he might have been causing on my threads. But now I think I was wrong about
that. I am better of not knowing about
certain posts if they are consistently argumentative or hostile or insulting.
Not that there is a problem just because some one disagrees with the result of a certain study I might post, they might even have countering studies. Nothing wrong with that, a little friendly debate, making counter points. But when the tone turns negative, why bother communicating with those folks? Here is X study I am referencing for your consideration. If you find it useful, great! If you think there might be problems with the study, I am all ears. If you want to prove how I don't understand how science works, or that I believe in magical thinking, or that I want to sell you vitamins, or that I want to hurt folks, then good bye! I won't be reading your negative vibes. How simple is that? Again, I should have taken advice on that years ago. Duh!