beyondworried- if you have enough pain to bone area, then radiation can eleviate that so may become an option, the ADT or HT drugs usually kick PCa way down unless one is more towards refractive or becoming hrpca/mrpca. Being a Gleason 10 you have more possible concerns about
aggressive PCa cells, you might have better response with estrogenic drugs added or using leukine,Keto, Zytiga, MDV3100 and some others.
With your ultra low psa values and if you have disease progression then you have very aggressive PCa (the PCa cells, DNA ploidy could be the 3rd or worse type of DNA structure and does not respond to HT as well) or even have an undiagnosed variant type (which is not as easily defined as you might think). An onco doc should be monitoring other markers for the biology of the disease, this is mentioned as to what those tests are in DR. Strum's book 'A Primer on Prostate Cancer' and the CTC blood test can also be useful, especially when used in comparisons over time. I guess the lesion being 1.3 is around 1/2" in size, if that helps for comparisons.
Dx-2002 Mar-Apr., emergency room total urinary blockage from PCa, no bph issues, bPsa 46.6, 12/12 biopsies all high volume PCa 80-95% in everyone of them, PNI in a few, Gleasons found 7,8,9's (2 sets ), given Gleason 8 overall by Grignon pathologist, ct and bone scans appearing clear, 8 opinions and denied surgery by Dr. Menon (correct decision too), fired 1 onco and 1 radiation doc, started with ADT3 drugs prior to radiations using 2 machines Neutron rays (Cyclotron) 10 sessions & Photon rays (IMRT) 24 sessions thereafter, 2 yrs. overall use of ADT3, monthly psa tests done and started to fail on ADT3, switched to DES and did way better for the next 8 yrs. of useage (occ. intermittently), starting to fail on this and considering my others options, new scans just done and getting advice and options on what I may do next.
Post Edited (zufus) : 11/11/2012 10:50:41 AM (GMT-7)