Had to run off and take a pet to the vet. Further blathering....
There are many treatment options and a non-treatment option. Unlike most of "modern medicine", they are all bad. There isn't (in my opinion) a good choice. Choosing the option that's
least bad when considering all the intersections of what's important to you, where (stage, mostly) your disease is at, which side effects are going to upset you the most, your overall health, age and various other factors is the best we can do.
The fact that I chose X doesn't mean X is the best choice for you. The fact that someone else else had Y and thinks that Y is for you and Y is the best thing going and Y has no side effects whatever usually means that they are a paid shill for Y who hasn't even had PCa, much less treatment Y, and sometimes that they actually did have Y and got lucky - which doesn't mean that you will.
In early stages, most of the treatments will effectively end the cancer for a large proportion of cases. Choosing between them is then a matter of choosing possible side effects, and using a large BS detector (this place works quite well) to get past providers poo-poo-ing the possibility that there will be side effects. In almost all cases there will be side effects - many are temporary, some end up being permanent. What will actually happen to a particular patient (you) is unknowable - statistics don't predict any individual case, but they do tell what happens to populations, so you can asses your odds of various outcomes, while realizing that "92% have outcome G" does not mean you'll certainly have outcome G - you get G or you get H, and it's more likely that you'll get G - but H is not ruled out simply because it's 11 times less likely. You roll the dice and get what you get.
If you are old enough and your cancer is placid enough, doing nothing may be the right choice. Virtually all men get it. If it does not show up until late in life, it's quite likely that you'll die with it, but not of it. Not my situation, so that was not my choice.
Finally, if you do choose surgery, the surgeon is more important than which tool they are using. I met with 2 specialist robotic surgeons, and I actually ended up going with the one who had less operations - I felt that he had enough, and he was in a much more convenient
location, and he only did one per day when operating. Sheer volume looked less appealing to me as the potential 2nd or 3rd operation of the day. the guy I used had also trained on the thing from the beginning of his career. Ultimately, you make a call based on whatever you make a call on - think of it as a job interview where you are the employer, not as lowly peon you meeting with great high-mucky-muck surgeon who deigns to see you. I'd take a good
open surgeon over a bad robot surgeon (but I might also go looking for a better robot surgeon, based on my preferences.)
Post Edited (RandomPseudoNym) : 1/29/2012 2:47:27 PM (GMT-7)