160,000 lung cancer deaths per year and 30,000 PCa deaths per year.
We know that since screening a combination of factors, including screening itself, have greatly reduced PCA related deaths. Yet we've been given the recent controversial PCa screening guidelines.
www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/30/obamacare-panel-approves-free-cancer-screenings-for-heavy-smokers/This story points out how lung cancer screening is approved (grade B) for smokers, including past smokers who quit up to 15 years ago. This is great news. Of course there is also a crowd, as mentioned in link, that says this will result in ODOT (in other words, cost money).
"Dr. Michael LeFevre of the University of Missouri in Columbia, who served on the task force, said “getting screened for lung cancer is not an alternative to quitting smoking,” but he said screening high-risk smokers can prevent as many as 20,000 deaths a year."
If it's about
saving lives, why the different treatment for lung cancer vis-a-vis PCa?