island time said...
Anyone else change how they do things...due to this disease?
(1) A factor (among many) affecting choice of retirement
location
(2) More emphasis on self-testing.
As of last month, we are both in retirement (yeah!). But have been taking short trips over last 18 mths to scope out places we might like to relocate to. Some of them were not exactly in the middle of first class medical facilities, so to speak. Have read enough here about
radiation gone wrong and difficulty of guys' handling some tertiary treatments to give us some pause. Would not want to be in recurrence without good medical help.
At same time, we have been watching what we think is another housing market bubble develop. So have put re
location on back burner for a while.
This cancer stuff has me in major cognitive dissonance.
On one hand, I saw my father-in-law die from prostate cancer, uncle die of it (with bad radiation SEs), brother-in-law just finish his radiation treatments, primary physician's father died of it, and my father died of cancer (lung and intestine, though) after surgery/radiation/chemo. I see my post-RALP uPSA reappearing, maybe stable though, and I read about
other 3+4=7 guys here that eventually didn't fare well.
On the other hand, I can run the nomograms and see pretty optimistic forecasts. My primary tells me not to worry. My uro only uses standard PSA ( down to .100)?" He's out of City of Hope program in last decade, so you'd think he's well trained, When I told him last Dec. about
the uPSA readings I was getting on my own LabCorp tests (between .020 - .030), he asked, "To what end? -- What are you going to do differently than you would when your PSA becomes apparent on the standard PSA (.100)?" Probably nothing, til it gets above .100, so he's got a point. But, like in the "Dirty Harry" movie---"I gots to know..."...
Robert