New model predicts control of the pandemic, if we all just do a few things (Article)

BillyBob...Off Guardian?...please. Most of your sources are scientific and verifiable. But, honestly, you really lost a lot of credibility with me when you quote the Off Guardian site. This source is full of conspiracy theories, pseudo-science, Russian propaganda, 9/11 lies and downright outrageous comments, e.g. "no one has died of the Corona Virus.

Gotta call it like I see it; that site is pure Cra*.

Jim

Buddy Blank said...
OffGuardian is an antivax, conspiracy theory crank site, that has minimized the pandemic since Day One. No one there has the slightest of medical credentials..........................................

I could go on and on with them.

They're kooks..........

BillyBob@388 said...
So then, when I asked " Crazy, or not?", your vote is clearly crazy? I just thought some of the graphs were interesting, if they are not false.

The fact you frequent such a site says it all. It fits right in with the rest of your "ideas" re: the lockdowns, IV vitamin C, HCQ, vitamin D, Sweden diet, etc. - OffGuardian has almost the exact same views.

Tudpock18 said...
BillyBob...Off Guardian?...please. Most of your sources are scientific and verifiable. But, honestly, you really lost a lot of credibility with me when you quote the Off Guardian site. This source is full of conspiracy theories, pseudo-science, Russian propaganda, 9/11 lies and downright outrageous comments, e.g. "no one has died of the Corona Virus.

Gotta call it like I see it; that site is pure Cra*.

Jim

Buddy Blank said...
Reading OffGuardian reminds me of a combination of Alex Jones, Mike Adams (the "Health" Ranger), and Dr. Mercola all rolled into one. Thankfully, Facebook finally banned Adams, but even with the banning, there is still a great deal of misinformation regarding health: antivax stuff, vitamin and supplement hustlers, and so on. In my view, all of these quacky kooks should be deplatformed.

Sigh. Or LOL, not sure which. My oh my. First I unintentionally insult Halbert, and now this.

The funny part is as soon as I quickly posted two posts one after the other, one from NYT and the other from this place called "OffGuardian", right before leaving the house today to go hiking, I thought to myself " I bet Buddy will research this while I am hiking and find out(unless he already knows) that at least one of those sites is some sort of evil institution.". Boy was that right about that! But I wasn't counting on Tudpock, guess I should have! LOL!

Guys, I grovel before you to plead that I have no clue who who "Offguardian" is, I never heard of them. In fact, I doubt I even realized the name of the folks who were writing this article. just saw what looked like an interesting title, clicked on it and thought "well, that seems both hopeful and interesting, wonder if the guys at HWPC might find it interesting", so I sent it over, with a note saying "Also both interesting and hopeful. Crazy, or not? Check out some of the graphs.", and headed out the door.

I get back from hiking and realize I have sinned in a major fashion. I even have Tudpock telling me "But, honestly, you really lost a lot of credibility with me when you quote the Off Guardian site.". Dang. If I had an ounce of decency in me, I would go away and leave all of you credible folks to work out the problems of the world.

And I see I was so bad I even set Buddy off to doing his tyrant thing again as well. If it was up to him, he would hold down every citizen and force them to take into their bodies whatever substance the always trustworthy government docs and Pharmaceutical say is required, and now he wants to ban free speech as well. "all of these quacky kooks should be deplatformed.". Well, I can see how that would make life easier for Buddy, none of these pesky folks with different opinions from him. Just put duct tape over those folks mouths and inject them!

Honestly, sometimes I think some folks around here just need to take a chill pill.

Buddy says: "The fact you frequent such a site says it all. It fits right in with the rest of your "ideas" re: the lockdowns, IV vitamin C, HCQ, vitamin D, Sweden diet, etc. - OffGuardian has almost the exact same views.".

Well, if by frequent, you mean I went there for the first time this morning, for the first time in history, when I clicked on a title that looked interesting, well then yes I frequent that site. However, you say they agree with me on D and IV C, etc? Well then, they must have something going in their favor, turns out they are not all that stupid. At least in some areas, they are obviously following the science and the studies. As Buddy will confirm, in agreement with them apparently, when he takes his 4000 IU of vitamin D today.

Really guys, chill out. I now realize that Offguardian is the source of all evil, but are their graphs in this article lies? Might be for all I know. Which I guess is why I asked "Crazy, or not?".

Post Edited (BillyBob@388) : 9/8/2020 4:30:14 PM (GMT-6)

Buddy, your rants against me are hypocritical You take 4000 IU/day of vitamin D, which is a whopping dose, and yet you continuously speak against the science- the almost endless scientific studies- that speak in favor of it.

I DO NOT present anecdotes, at least I MOSTLY don't present anecdotes. I present scientific studies which you and certain(but not all) medical authorities insist on ignoring, even as you are smart enough to take it yourself.

What new member did I "hector?. I think I remember that. I did advise him to look into his pre- diabetes or diabetes and/or high insulin situation, to make sure none of that applied to him. Because if it does, it is incredibly important.

" It will not be tolerated.". There it is! Again. That time you got a thread shut down and followed me, uninvited, to my home e-mail, to tell me what would not be tolerated. Classic tyrant.

BTW, this rant you just sent me is too long. I can't be bothered to read all of it. Don't forget to take your 4000 IU of Vitamin D.

Post Edited (BillyBob@388) : 9/8/2020 6:03:21 PM (GMT-6)