Thank you for all your comments. I read them and meant to reply sooner--but I've been a little distracted these days.
MotownPaul, I hope that your PSA remains undetectable. I don't think I know anything about
LVI. What exactly is that?
In case others have similar questions about
lymph node involvement, here is what the urologic oncologist told us:
--they don't usually remove a hot lymph node in that area. It's too hard to find and, with previous surgery, it would be too difficult. Better to have it radiated (or is it irradiated?). Hopefully that will kill the cancer there and any micro-mets, as Mattam pointed out above.
--with this new found LN involvement, it's reasonable to see a medical oncologist. That would be the doctor who would treat next, if there's a recurrence. And MOs are very knowledgeable about
hormone therapy so could chime in on the next question
--this doctor, the urologic oncologist, would recommend extending the hormone therapy from 6 months to a year or two, but would leave the decision to the RO and MO--and us. UPDATE: My husband's RO doesn't necessarily agree that the HT needs to be extended. He also said that the MOs there do not agree about
how long HT should be for someone whose PET scan shows lymph node involvement. Yet another area that is ripe for studies.
--no need to have PSMA scan read by someone else. The person who read it is very experienced.
--re the future: not as bleak as my husband had been thinking. Despite what the American Cancer Society site said about
prostate cancer staging, local lymph node involvement is NOT stage 4. The doctor said, just as Pratoman said above, that prostate cancer staging doesn't work that way. Also, more important than a label or stage, the doctor said that this is potentially curable! Yay!
I'm glad we insisted on talking to the doctor because it changed my husband's mood entirely. Mine too.
Thank you all for your continued support. You are the best!
Post Edited (Melaine) : 2/6/2022 4:28:12 PM (GMT-7)