Tunnelvisionary said...
Old Mike said...
This is the one I was actually looking for,when I first commented on this thread. Mostly what I have thought
all along is the dysbiosis is caused by the immune system.
We also have seemingly confirming results that there is no dysbiosis in early onset UC,from another study of which
I have posted a few times in the past.
Seems like FMT might work better if you can stop the inflammation prior to FMT,wild guess.
Old Mike
So far, I think the most we can sufficiently say based off evidence is that single FMTs do not work for UC like they did for c diff. Many studies have reported these same results, but the majority of them have only done a single transplant. I think the reason for that is that they're mostly trying to assess the safety of the procedure for IBD. FMT advocate groups have tended to find that multiple transplants done once a day for some extended amount of time have better results.
For many, the symptoms do eventually come back. Those who claim to have been in remission from FMT for years rarely did just FMT, but they treated themselves side by side with drugs to suppress inflammation (personally I believe the drugs should be working well already for it to work), fed the microbes with a greater variety of fibers (and other things microbes eat). One used whey protein shakes, which I think might be smart to help the gut wall heal and mucus regenerate. Maybe gelatin would be better. Up for debate.
Based off this info, it would seem wiser to do FMTs while you're being treated with traditional meds and the treatments are working. Stuff like DIY FMT is more appealing when you're desperate and the meds have stopped working, not so much when they are...but it might be more beneficial to do when they are working well.It is very difficult to conduct a scientific study around FMT. I think Borody is doing a great job, but there are certain criticisms with his method. I do not believing in using antibiotics prior to the FMT. He's not trained in nutrition, so I would only expect him to employ methods that conform with his medical training.
While I understand Old Mike's paper and the rational behind why the correction induced by FMT and other therapies is transient, I still do not believe it broadly addresses all the intricacies that need to be involved prior to and after FMT. For starters, it is very difficult to do FMT while the mucosal lining is still inflamed. This is one of the reasons a certain percentage of those with severe UC will not respond to the transplant right off the bat. Unfortunately, they will be counted as failures in the statistics. Hurst mentioned the temporary use of pred or mesalamines to settle the inflammation down first.
Any FMT study
must account for all the other factors that go into rebuilding the inflamed mucosa lining for it to be successful. I do not believe the mucosa lining will heal without a sound nutritional approach, and certain nutritional adjuncts are absolutely necessary in the beginning stages. I think whey protein, along with gelatin (glycine / proline amino acids) and l-glutamine, are vital.
I truly do think the whole is greater than the sum of the individual parts. Every component, even stress, needs to be addressed thoroughly. Hurst touched up on why those with severe UC (and I'm talking about
cases necessitating surgical outcomes) hit remission with just the placebo. I do think there is tremendous power in believing that you can heal, and it does influence the outcome of FMT.