Here's a good one for you.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com said...
In CD and UC, anti-TNF biologics are efficacious in reducing the odds of
hospitalization by half and surgery by 33–77%. Azathioprine and vedolizumab were not associated with a similar improvement, but robust conclusions may be limited due to paucity of RCTs.
(2016) Systematic review with meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of immunosuppressants and biologics for reducing hospitalisation and surgery in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis
E. J. Mao*, G. S. Hazlewood
Source:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/apt.13847And another:
said...
Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapy has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment. Infliximab and adalimumab either as monotherapy or in combination with an immunomodulator are able to induce clinical and biological remission in patients with moderate and severe Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). These new therapies have led to a shift in the goals of IBD management from just controlling clinical symptoms to preventing disease progression. However, despite these advances in medical therapy, surgery is still required in 30%-40% of patients with CD and 20%-30% of patients with UC at some point during their lifetime.
(2016) Inflammatory bowel disease surgery in the biologic era
Linda Ferrari, Mukta K Krane, and Alessandro Fichera
Source:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc4872064/However the last bit of that last one makes me wonder "surgery for 20%-30% of patients with UC at some point during their lifetime". Isn't that the same as old studies...